OPEN PANEL — Operating Contracts
OPEN PANEL — Operating Contracts
Section titled “OPEN PANEL — Operating Contracts”The operating-governance contracts that make the two-entity structure run legally and predictably. Where FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS describe durable technical interfaces, this file describes durable organizational interfaces — the policies that keep the 501(c)(3) exemption intact and route officer wealth to the for-profit side. Status: DRAFT v0.1 — working assumptions, not legal/financial advice. Source of truth:
CANON.md§2, §5, §7. Legal spine:business/LEGAL_STRUCTURE.md(forward ref). Business model:business/BUSINESS_MODEL.md.
0. How to read this file
Section titled “0. How to read this file”Eleven operating contracts (canon §7). Each is specified as: Purpose · Scope · Key provisions · Owner · Review cadence · Failure mode prevented. Two entities throughout:
- FOUNDATION = OPEN PANEL FOUNDATION (US 501(c)(3) public charity, IP owner, free comics).
- VARIANT = the for-profit sister (licensing, merch, partnerships, collectibles).
The through-line: every contract below exists to satisfy the canon §2 hard constraint — no private inurement, no excess-benefit transaction — while still letting officers build real wealth, but only through VARIANT equity/profit, never through FOUNDATION residuals.
1. Governance charter
Section titled “1. Governance charter”- Purpose. Establish two genuinely separate boards with defined decision rights, so the FOUNDATION’s independence from VARIANT is structural, not cosmetic.
- Scope. Both boards; board composition, reserved matters, inter-entity decision flow.
- Key provisions.
- The two boards are not identical. A majority of the FOUNDATION board is independent of VARIANT (no VARIANT equity, employment, or compensation; no immediate family with same).
- Reserved matters requiring independent-director approval at the FOUNDATION: adopting or amending the master license, setting officer compensation, approving any Foundation↔VARIANT transaction, approving the reinvestment plan and reserve targets.
- Officers who sit on, or are interested in, VARIANT are recused from FOUNDATION votes touching VARIANT (ties to contract #2).
- Clear decision-rights matrix: program/editorial → FOUNDATION; commerce/licensing terms → VARIANT; the master license + IP ownership → FOUNDATION, negotiated arm’s-length.
- Owner. FOUNDATION board chair (with VARIANT board chair for the joint sections).
- Review cadence. Annually; plus on any board-composition change or new entity relationship.
- Failure mode prevented. Overlapping/captured boards → the IRS treats the two entities as one, attribution destroys arm’s-length status, and the UBIT royalty exclusion and exemption itself are at risk.
2. Conflict-of-interest policy
Section titled “2. Conflict-of-interest policy”- Purpose. Govern every Foundation↔VARIANT transaction (and any insider transaction) so none is a disguised distribution of charitable assets.
- Scope. All directors, officers, and key employees of the FOUNDATION; all transactions with VARIANT, with insiders, and with insider-affiliated parties.
- Key provisions.
- Annual written disclosure of all financial interests, VARIANT holdings, and affiliations by every director/officer/key employee.
- Recusal: an interested person discloses, leaves the room, and does not vote on or influence the matter; the transaction is approved only by disinterested directors.
- Each inter-entity transaction must be found fair and reasonable to the FOUNDATION on the record, with alternatives considered where practical.
- Contemporaneous minutes record who was present, who recused, the comparability/ valuation basis, and the vote.
- Owner. FOUNDATION board secretary / governance committee.
- Review cadence. Policy reviewed annually; disclosures collected annually and on any new material interest; applied per-transaction.
- Failure mode prevented. Self-dealing and excess-benefit transactions (IRC §4958) — insider excise taxes, manager penalties, and in egregious/repeat cases loss of exemption.
3. Compensation policy (nonprofit officers)
Section titled “3. Compensation policy (nonprofit officers)”- Purpose. Pay FOUNDATION officers reasonable compensation only, via the §4958 rebuttable-presumption safe harbor — and explicitly forbid any revenue share for nonprofit officers.
- Scope. All FOUNDATION officers, directors, and disqualified persons; all forms of compensation (salary, bonus, benefits, deferred comp).
- Key provisions.
- Compensation set by an independent compensation committee (no one whose own pay is being set; no VARIANT-interested members for the matter at hand).
- Decision rests on comparability data — pay at similarly sized, similarly missioned organizations in a comparable market.
- Contemporaneous documentation — the committee records the data relied on, the decision, the basis, and the date, at the time of decision.
- Any bonus is tied to mission / non-financial metrics (reach, titles published, accessibility, creator satisfaction) — never to FOUNDATION revenue, surplus, or royalty receipts.
- No revenue share, no profit interest, no equity in the FOUNDATION for any insider. All upside-via-equity lives in VARIANT (contract maps in §12).
- Owner. FOUNDATION compensation committee (independent directors).
- Review cadence. Annually per officer, and on any new hire / material raise / role change.
- Failure mode prevented. Excessive or revenue-linked nonprofit comp = private inurement / excess benefit; the safe harbor shifts the burden to the IRS instead of the org.
4. Reinvestment policy
Section titled “4. Reinvestment policy”- Purpose. Codify that FOUNDATION residuals are mandatorily reinvested into the charitable mission — never distributed to insiders — and set reserve discipline.
- Scope. All FOUNDATION net surplus (RESIDUALS), including royalties received from VARIANT.
- Key provisions.
- RESIDUALS flow, in priority order, to: (a) the free-comics program, (b) fair creator pay, (c) operating + program reserves.
- Reserve targets: a stated floor (e.g. 6–12 months operating expenses) and a cap above which surplus must be redeployed to program; targets approved by independent directors.
- Zero distribution to insiders — restated here as an absolute, cross-referenced to contracts #2 and #3.
- Annual board-approved reinvestment plan; variance reported to the board.
- Owner. FOUNDATION board / finance committee; executed by FOUNDATION CFO/treasurer.
- Review cadence. Annually (plan + reserve targets); quarterly variance review.
- Failure mode prevented. Surplus accumulating without charitable purpose (exemption scrutiny) or leaking to insiders (inurement); also undercapitalization that forces mission cuts in a downturn.
5. IP intake & licensing policy
Section titled “5. IP intake & licensing policy”- Purpose. Define how IP enters the FOUNDATION and flows arm’s-length to VARIANT via the master license, with independent valuation.
- Scope. All works created through the charitable program; the FOUNDATION→VARIANT master license; any amendment, renewal, or new grant.
- Key provisions.
- Intake: IP created in-program is owned by the FOUNDATION per the Creator Agreement (canon §5 hybrid: FOUNDATION holds a perpetual free-distribution license + first commercial option; creator co-owns). Chain of title recorded in the Ledger.
- Arm’s-length license to VARIANT: royalty terms set by independent valuation, approved only by disinterested FOUNDATION directors with full COI recusal (#2), memorialized in a written master license (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #6).
- The FOUNDATION grants rights, not services — to keep royalties passive and UBIT-excluded under §512(b)(2); any service component is isolated and separately priced.
- All grants, terms, and payouts are represented in the Rights & Royalty Ledger (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #4) so the legal text and the data agree.
- Owner. FOUNDATION board (approval) + general counsel; VARIANT as counterparty.
- Review cadence. Valuation refreshed on each material grant and at license renewal; policy reviewed annually.
- Failure mode prevented. Below-market or sloppy IP transfer = excess benefit to VARIANT insiders, and a services-flavored license = lost UBIT exclusion (royalties become taxable).
6. Creator revenue-share policy
Section titled “6. Creator revenue-share policy”- Purpose. Operationalize the canon §5 hybrid creator economics — how shares are set, accrued, paid through the Ledger, and made transparent to creators.
- Scope. All creators with a Creator Agreement; all downstream licensing revenue attributable to their work.
- Key provisions.
- Default share: author-favorable placeholder — 50% of net downstream licensing revenue attributable to the work (canon §5; operator to set final number).
- Terms are machine-readable in the Creator Agreement data model (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #5) and drive the Ledger — accrual is computed, not manual.
- Accrual → payout: revenue attribution recorded per work; shares accrued per term; paid on a stated cycle via the Ledger payout rail; statements issued each cycle.
- Transparency: each creator can see attributed revenue, accruals, and payouts for their works; dispute/audit path defined.
- Creator pay is funded from VARIANT proceeds (a program cost), distinct from FOUNDATION residual reinvestment (#4).
- Owner. FOUNDATION creator-relations + finance; VARIANT supplies revenue data.
- Review cadence. Per payout cycle (operational); policy + default % annually.
- Failure mode prevented. Opaque or mis-accrued creator pay → loss of creator trust (the business’s lifeblood, per Image Comics benchmark) and disputes/clawbacks; also keeps creator economics from muddying the charitable program.
7. Data & privacy policy
Section titled “7. Data & privacy policy”- Purpose. Protect readers — especially minors — and set the FOUNDATION/VARIANT data posture (minimization, retention, lawful basis).
- Scope. All reader/account/event data across web, mobile, desktop, backend; donors; creators; licensee contacts.
- Key provisions.
- Minors / COPPA: comics skew young — age-gating at account creation; for users under the COPPA threshold, no behavioral tracking and verifiable-parental-consent flows where required; minimal data collection.
- GDPR posture: lawful basis per processing purpose; data-subject rights (access, deletion, portability); EU representative/transfer mechanism if EU users are served.
- Data minimization: collect only what the reading/commerce product needs; no third-party ad trackers (canon §4); privacy-respecting analytics only.
- Retention schedule per data class; deletion on schedule and on valid request.
- One identity across reader/buyer/licensee contexts (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #3) with context-scoped data use.
- Owner. Data-protection lead (FOUNDATION); shared obligations on VARIANT for commerce data.
- Review cadence. Annually; on any new data flow, vendor, or jurisdiction.
- Failure mode prevented. COPPA/GDPR penalties, reputational harm with a youth audience, and mission-incoherent surveillance (“library energy, not paywall energy”).
8. Editorial & content-rating policy
Section titled “8. Editorial & content-rating policy”- Purpose. Define what gets published, how it is rated, moderated, and taken down.
- Scope. All comics and creator-submitted content across both standard issues and VARIANT editions; reader-facing UGC where applicable.
- Key provisions.
- Acceptance criteria: quality, originality/rights-clearance, mission fit, and completeness of CPF metadata (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #1) including credits and alt-text.
- Ratings system: an age/content rating carried in the CPF and surfaced to readers, consistent across surfaces; drives age-appropriate display (ties to #7 age-gating).
- Moderation: review pipeline for submissions; reporting flow for published content.
- Takedown: defined process for rights complaints, ratings errors, and policy violations, with timelines and appeal.
- Owner. FOUNDATION editorial / trust & safety (WS10).
- Review cadence. Annually; rating taxonomy reviewed as standards/markets change.
- Failure mode prevented. Publishing infringing, mis-rated, or harmful content to a young audience — legal exposure, platform-trust collapse, and exemption-relevant program risk.
9. Brand & trademark usage policy
Section titled “9. Brand & trademark usage policy”- Purpose. Keep all marks owned by the FOUNDATION and license their use to VARIANT and partners under quality control.
- Scope. OPEN PANEL, OPEN PANEL FOUNDATION, VARIANT, and all related marks/logos; every use by VARIANT, sublicensees, manufacturers, and partners.
- Key provisions.
- FOUNDATION owns all trademarks (canon §1); VARIANT and partners use them only under a written trademark license.
- Quality-control provisions (mandatory for a valid mark license): brand/usage standards, approval rights, and the FOUNDATION’s right to inspect and enforce.
- The trademark license to VARIANT is itself a Foundation↔VARIANT transaction → subject to COI (#2) and arm’s-length valuation (#5); royalty/fee for mark use, if any, flows to the Ledger.
- Sublicense terms flow brand standards down to manufacturers/partners.
- Owner. FOUNDATION (mark owner) + general counsel; brand/design (WS9) for standards.
- Review cadence. Annually; on each new partner/sublicensee; mark filings tracked per renewal deadlines.
- Failure mode prevented. Naked licensing (no quality control) → loss of trademark rights; uncontrolled brand dilution; and unpriced mark use that becomes an inurement flag.
10. Financial controls
Section titled “10. Financial controls”- Purpose. Ensure the FOUNDATION’s finances are auditable, UBIT-clean, and segregated from VARIANT, with disciplined transfer pricing.
- Scope. Both entities’ finances; the inter-entity money flows; reserves; tax filings.
- Key provisions.
- Annual independent audit of the FOUNDATION (and consolidated view of inter-entity flows).
- UBIT monitoring / Form 990-T: track any unrelated-business income; keep the master license passive royalty (no substantial services) to preserve §512(b)(2) exclusion; file 990-T if UBIT arises.
- Segregation of duties: initiation, approval, and recording of payments are separated; separate bank/Stripe accounts for FOUNDATION donations vs. VARIANT commerce (canon §4).
- Reserves tracked against the targets in #4.
- Inter-entity transfer pricing: royalty and any service fees set at arm’s-length, documented, and reconciled to the Ledger; periodic benchmarking.
- Owner. FOUNDATION CFO/treasurer + audit committee; VARIANT finance for its side.
- Review cadence. Annual audit; quarterly financial review; 990/990-T at filing; transfer pricing benchmarked annually.
- Failure mode prevented. Commingling, undetected UBIT, mispriced inter-entity transfers, and fraud — each of which threatens the exemption, the royalty exclusion, or solvency.
11. Inter-team SLAs
Section titled “11. Inter-team SLAs”- Purpose. Make the three operating surfaces — product, FOUNDATION program, VARIANT commerce — interoperate predictably, with defined escalation and reliability.
- Scope. Product/platform ↔ FOUNDATION program/editorial ↔ VARIANT commerce/licensing; the shared Ledger and reader engine as contract points.
- Key provisions.
- Response/turnaround SLAs: editorial review turnaround for submissions; commerce response for licensee/partner requests; product support/incident response.
- Uptime targets for reader delivery and commerce surfaces; degradation/incident comms.
- Escalation ladder: owner → team lead → cross-entity steering, with timeboxes.
- Contract points: changes to the Ledger or reader engine follow the FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS change discipline (“change rarely, break loudly”).
- Owner. Shared — product lead, FOUNDATION program lead, VARIANT commerce lead.
- Review cadence. Quarterly SLA review; per-incident retrospectives.
- Failure mode prevented. Cross-team ambiguity stalling launches, missed creator/partner commitments, and silent breaking changes to the shared backbone.
12. Mapping to the legal structure & foundational contracts
Section titled “12. Mapping to the legal structure & foundational contracts”How these operating contracts enforce business/LEGAL_STRUCTURE.md and the foundational
contracts — so officer wealth stays on the VARIANT side and the exemption is protected.
| Legal requirement (canon §2 / LEGAL_STRUCTURE) | Enforcing operating contract(s) | Foundational-contract tie |
|---|---|---|
| No private inurement / no excess benefit | #2 COI, #3 Comp (no rev-share), #4 Reinvestment | — |
| §4958 rebuttable-presumption safe harbor | #3 Comp (indep. committee · comparability · contemporaneous docs) | — |
| Officer wealth via VARIANT equity only, never FOUNDATION residuals | #3 (forbids NP equity/rev-share) + #4 (residuals → mission) | — |
| Arm’s-length Foundation→VARIANT license | #5 IP/licensing, #2 COI, #10 transfer pricing | #6 Inter-entity License; #4 Ledger |
| Royalties passive → UBIT-excluded §512(b)(2) | #5 (rights not services), #10 (UBIT monitoring/990-T) | #4 Ledger; #6 License |
| Board independence / no captured boards | #1 Governance charter | — |
| Mandatory reinvestment of residuals | #4 Reinvestment | — |
| Creator rights + machine-readable terms | #6 Creator rev-share | #5 Creator Agreement; #4 Ledger |
| Marks owned by FOUNDATION, licensed w/ quality control | #9 Brand & trademark | — |
| Reader/minor data lawful | #7 Data & privacy | #3 Identity & Entitlements; #7 Event/Analytics |
| Auditable, segregated finances | #10 Financial controls | #4 Ledger |
Net effect: #3 + #4 keep all nonprofit upside out of insider hands; #2 + #5 + #10 keep the inter-entity bridge arm’s-length and the royalties passive; #1 keeps the boards independent so the IRS can’t attribute the two entities to each other. Together they let VARIANT carry officer equity/profit (legal) while the FOUNDATION carries only mission and reasonable comp (exempt).
13. Adoption checklist
Section titled “13. Adoption checklist”Before launch (entity formation / WS0):
- #1 Governance charter adopted; independent-majority FOUNDATION board seated.
- #2 Conflict-of-interest policy adopted; first annual disclosures collected.
- #3 Compensation policy adopted; independent comp committee constituted.
- #4 Reinvestment policy adopted with reserve targets.
- #7 Data & privacy policy live (age-gating + retention) before any reader signup.
- #8 Editorial & content-rating policy live before first publication.
- #9 Brand & trademark policy adopted; marks filed; quality-control terms drafted.
- #10 Financial controls baseline: segregated accounts, segregation of duties, audit engaged.
Before first license (Foundation→VARIANT or any partner):
- #5 IP intake & licensing policy adopted; independent valuation obtained.
- #6 Inter-entity master license executed (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #6) and represented in the Ledger.
- #2 COI recusal exercised and minuted for the license vote.
- #9 Trademark license to VARIANT executed with quality-control provisions.
- #10 Transfer-pricing basis documented; UBIT posture confirmed (passive royalty).
Before first payout (creator or royalty):
- #6 Creator revenue-share policy adopted; default % set by operator.
- Creator Agreement data model live and driving the Ledger (FOUNDATIONAL_CONTRACTS #4, #5).
- #10 Payout controls (segregation of duties, reconciliation to Ledger) in place.
- Creator transparency/statements path operational.
Always-on (cadence owners assigned):
- #11 Inter-team SLAs published; escalation ladder staffed.
- Annual review calendar set for every policy above; annual audit + 990/990-T scheduled.